Downvoted for knee-jerk anti-anti-sexism of the “straw-womyn” variety: making shit up about pronouns instead of responding to the substantive concern about the impression being given that naturalism is for boys, not girls.
Down voted for knee jerk downvote. I’ve spent quite a bit of time thinking about this, this isn’t something that I did on a whim at all. And like I said:
Your comment isn’t by far the worst offender at this kind of utilitarian fail I consistently see. It is not even that bad at it since it hasn’t launched drama. But I have a general policy of down voting all such comments to which I will adhere.
The post itself wasn’t bad, which is why I didn’t down vote it (hint: +1-1 = 0) I just used it to criticize a constant low grade ideological axe people are grinding.
In any case its kind of the point of using Charlie Sheen to say stuff that will get me down voted but I think need to be said.
In any case its kind of the point of using Charlie Sheen to say stuff that will get me down voted but I think need to be said.
Oh? A sockpuppet? Not welcome. Will downvote every comment by the account and encourage everyone else to do likewise. Sockpuppet comments should not be visible. (This is my universal policy.)
Do you downvote all of my submissions, since this is a sock-puppet account?
No. Your account doesn’t fit the profile (as far as I have noticed).
I’m rather shocked that the grandparent was negatively received. I was advocating penalising of overt subversion of the reputation system and the contribution standards it is there to support.
Don’t have a problem with this as long as you really are consistent and down vote Clippy, Quirrell, ect. Would be interested in a link to your rationale, which I feel you must have written out somewhere. I mean seriously “Charlie Sheen” I’m surprised you didn’t catch this one of the n other times I’ve said and implied this is an alt to keep my IRL name sort of safe.
If it makes you feel any better I can agree to permanently stop using my main account. What I say with it mostly isn’t as needed as what I say with this one anyway.
Don’t have a problem with this as long as you really are consistent and down vote Clippy, Quirrell, ect.
Yes.
Would be interested in a link to your rationale, which I feel you must have written out somewhere.
Yes, somewhere. Two of the purposes of the karma system are:
To discourage people from posting undesired comments. You outright declare that this is what you are trying to subvert: “In any case its kind of the point of using Charlie Sheen to say stuff that will get me down voted but I think need to be said.”
To give an indication of whether the posts of a user are likely to be worth reading, as well as how good the user is at thinking (useful when choosing how much credibility to assign them.) This is also subverted both in terms of karma score and direct associations with the user.
The even more obvious reason is that users who are logging in with multiple accounts will end up voting multiple times on the same comment. This is obviously not good.
The even more obvious reason is that users who are logging in with multiple accounts will end up voting multiple times on the same comment. This is obviously not good.
I don’t do that, but obviously you only have my word for that. Thank you for elaborating.
Downvoted for knee-jerk anti-anti-sexism of the “straw-womyn” variety: making shit up about pronouns instead of responding to the substantive concern about the impression being given that naturalism is for boys, not girls.
Down voted for knee jerk downvote. I’ve spent quite a bit of time thinking about this, this isn’t something that I did on a whim at all. And like I said:
The post itself wasn’t bad, which is why I didn’t down vote it (hint: +1-1 = 0) I just used it to criticize a constant low grade ideological axe people are grinding.
In any case its kind of the point of using Charlie Sheen to say stuff that will get me down voted but I think need to be said.
Oh? A sockpuppet? Not welcome. Will downvote every comment by the account and encourage everyone else to do likewise. Sockpuppet comments should not be visible. (This is my universal policy.)
Do you downvote all of my submissions, since this is a sock-puppet account?
No. Your account doesn’t fit the profile (as far as I have noticed).
I’m rather shocked that the grandparent was negatively received. I was advocating penalising of overt subversion of the reputation system and the contribution standards it is there to support.
Don’t have a problem with this as long as you really are consistent and down vote Clippy, Quirrell, ect. Would be interested in a link to your rationale, which I feel you must have written out somewhere. I mean seriously “Charlie Sheen” I’m surprised you didn’t catch this one of the n other times I’ve said and implied this is an alt to keep my IRL name sort of safe.
If it makes you feel any better I can agree to permanently stop using my main account. What I say with it mostly isn’t as needed as what I say with this one anyway.
Yes.
Yes, somewhere. Two of the purposes of the karma system are:
To discourage people from posting undesired comments. You outright declare that this is what you are trying to subvert: “In any case its kind of the point of using Charlie Sheen to say stuff that will get me down voted but I think need to be said.”
To give an indication of whether the posts of a user are likely to be worth reading, as well as how good the user is at thinking (useful when choosing how much credibility to assign them.) This is also subverted both in terms of karma score and direct associations with the user.
The even more obvious reason is that users who are logging in with multiple accounts will end up voting multiple times on the same comment. This is obviously not good.
I don’t do that, but obviously you only have my word for that. Thank you for elaborating.