CEA registry is interesting but it doesn’t have a standardised database of QALY or DALY by condition
Global burden of disease doesn’t format their content in a fashion suitable for direct comparison of health state, unweighted by prevalence. I have a preference for QALY over DALY anyway.
2012-01-10076 Nursing home care with Alzheimer’s disease (severe-end stage) 0.34
2012-01-10076 Home care with Alzheimer’s disease 0.6
2012-01-08699 Caregiver of a person with Alzheimer’s Disease 0.9
2012-01-08699 Patients with Alzheimer’s disease 0.408
A utility weight over a year is the QALY; if you die in a year of Alzheimer’s, and the weight of that year is 0.6, then you lost 0.4 QALYs compared to if you had lived that year in perfect health and then died, no?
CEA registry is interesting but it doesn’t have a standardised database of QALY or DALY by condition
Global burden of disease doesn’t format their content in a fashion suitable for direct comparison of health state, unweighted by prevalence. I have a preference for QALY over DALY anyway.
I’m not sure what you mean. If you search CEA, you get back utilities. If you search “Alzheimer’s” in https://research.tufts-nemc.org/cear4/SearchingtheCEARegistry/SearchtheCEARegistry.aspx you get back
A utility weight over a year is the QALY; if you die in a year of Alzheimer’s, and the weight of that year is 0.6, then you lost 0.4 QALYs compared to if you had lived that year in perfect health and then died, no?