But for the purpose of actually getting scientists to hear out the crazy ideas (which are correct every once in a while (EDIT: ID/creationism not being one of those!)) without risking anything, I think this is a great idea.
However, the main problem is that ID people don’t really come up with new ideas. They just skim through the existing scientific literature, look for open, unresolved cases (discovered, asked by scientists) and point at them: “See, you can’t explain that yet..., therefore ID is true.”
However, the main problem is that ID people don’t really come up with new ideas. They just skim through the existing scientific literature, look for open, unresolved cases (discovered, asked by scientists) and point at them: “See, you can’t explain that yet..., therefore ID is true.”