from my observation and first time experience of a thread in a specific category. the article was noise and provided little signal. statements voted down by those who may lack objectivity or provoke voting down because it challenges participant’s own belief systems.
i call into question the entire thread’s bias which of and in itself challenges the premise of the less wrong objective.
less wrong is wrong in this category. i am not even an expert in this field and can see the fallacy which compels me to draw experts here to deal with this accordingly. nevertheless, it begs the question, how wrong is “less wrong” everywhere else.
less wrong pursues the objective to be clear, when confusion is what it facilitates in the relative instance. however, life is messy, and innovation and growth are built through creative destruction.
given the type of group think and self containerized thinking less wrong may consume itself into a black hole of never ending knowledge pursuit and implode upon itself hardly making the progress it hoped to achieve.
this comment is being made as an effort to provide feedback.
problems create new problems, [like from like]. human evolution according to Popper, problem solves thereby generating temporary solutions, which reveal errors and omissions, and a new set of problems.
Because of your posting style, I’m having trouble understanding what you’re trying to say. And looking over your old posts, I don’t think what you have to say is any different from gibberish. Have a nice day.
from my observation and first time experience of a thread in a specific category. the article was noise and provided little signal. statements voted down by those who may lack objectivity or provoke voting down because it challenges participant’s own belief systems.
i call into question the entire thread’s bias which of and in itself challenges the premise of the less wrong objective.
less wrong is wrong in this category. i am not even an expert in this field and can see the fallacy which compels me to draw experts here to deal with this accordingly. nevertheless, it begs the question, how wrong is “less wrong” everywhere else.
less wrong pursues the objective to be clear, when confusion is what it facilitates in the relative instance. however, life is messy, and innovation and growth are built through creative destruction.
given the type of group think and self containerized thinking less wrong may consume itself into a black hole of never ending knowledge pursuit and implode upon itself hardly making the progress it hoped to achieve.
this comment is being made as an effort to provide feedback.
problems create new problems, [like from like]. human evolution according to Popper, problem solves thereby generating temporary solutions, which reveal errors and omissions, and a new set of problems.
Because of your posting style, I’m having trouble understanding what you’re trying to say. And looking over your old posts, I don’t think what you have to say is any different from gibberish. Have a nice day.