perhaps creating an internal peer review network between SIAI and FHI and some other people might be a useful compromise.
Yes, we do this. This is one benefit of the research associates program, for example.
Make this explicit—the aim is not only to produce high quality output but also to signal that this is high quality output. Mark papers as “reviewed by X” or something.
Curious if you guys found anonymous reviews useful.
Yes, we do this. This is one benefit of the research associates program, for example.
Make this explicit—the aim is not only to produce high quality output but also to signal that this is high quality output. Mark papers as “reviewed by X” or something.
Curious if you guys found anonymous reviews useful.