What’s abusive about it? It seemed to me like a straightforward error, but the presentation was admittedly bad. I was tired and possibly inebriated; so it goes. Nobody lost many hedons over it.
On the gripping hand, gwern doesn’t even talk about komponisto’s tacit conflation of karma with correctness, or that of total karma with total number of people approving. I don’t even agree with gwern on the issue at hand, as I said before.
I gained respect for him because it takes a great deal of nerve to write such a thing, and I think that’s admirable. Or maybe my model of gwern is more accurate than yours? I don’t know.
EDIT: Rereading that thread, I notice drethelin did succeed in convincing komponisto of a related point. As I expected, it took more writing than I was interested in doing at the time. Props to it, as well.
I don’t know. I gained more respect for gwern after reading his comment.
Pardon me: ”… with the obvious exception of the other person who has also been heavily downvoted for abusing komponisto in the same context”
What’s abusive about it? It seemed to me like a straightforward error, but the presentation was admittedly bad. I was tired and possibly inebriated; so it goes. Nobody lost many hedons over it.
On the gripping hand, gwern doesn’t even talk about komponisto’s tacit conflation of karma with correctness, or that of total karma with total number of people approving. I don’t even agree with gwern on the issue at hand, as I said before.
I gained respect for him because it takes a great deal of nerve to write such a thing, and I think that’s admirable. Or maybe my model of gwern is more accurate than yours? I don’t know.
EDIT: Rereading that thread, I notice drethelin did succeed in convincing komponisto of a related point. As I expected, it took more writing than I was interested in doing at the time. Props to it, as well.