There seems to be an almost deliberate political mind killing when one has a graph where Stalin and Hilter are on the opposite side of anarchism and libertarianism.
I’m not sure. But I’m also not sure putting figures there is at all necessary. Putting figures in only some parts of the graph and not in others seems unhelpful to start with.
I would say that the bottom left quadrant (limited state control/ pro-individual freedom/ some suspicion of property) is mostly the domain of modern liberalism, although that would more be in the center of the square then in the extreme.
There seems to be an almost deliberate political mind killing when one has a graph where Stalin and Hilter are on the opposite side of anarchism and libertarianism.
Perhaps you’re unaware of the poor reputations that anarchism and libertarianism have for many people in the center.
I’m aware. I don’t see how that justifies making a graph that implicitly says “yeah, we’re the opposite of the baddies”.
What figures would you put at those corners? Lenin and Louis IV, maybe?
I’m not sure. But I’m also not sure putting figures there is at all necessary. Putting figures in only some parts of the graph and not in others seems unhelpful to start with.
I would say that the bottom left quadrant (limited state control/ pro-individual freedom/ some suspicion of property) is mostly the domain of modern liberalism, although that would more be in the center of the square then in the extreme.