I mostly agree with you, but let’s not take this “reversing stupidity” too far. Centuries ago, many people died in their child years, so this is not as strong evidence as it would be in a hypothetical universe where people ate when they were hungry and all children survived.
I mean, maybe with 90% of children, letting them wait until they are hungry would be okay, but with 10% it would be harmful. Such hypothesis can only be proved or disproved by someone with detailed knowledge, not by simple comparison with eating habit of our ancestors.
It may also be a matter of convenience for the parents—if you let the child stop eating when they feel like it, they might be hungry in a half an hour, when you were hoping to do something else.
I’d want to see some cross-cultural work on how much parents control the amount small children eat.
I mostly agree with you, but let’s not take this “reversing stupidity” too far. Centuries ago, many people died in their child years, so this is not as strong evidence as it would be in a hypothetical universe where people ate when they were hungry and all children survived.
I mean, maybe with 90% of children, letting them wait until they are hungry would be okay, but with 10% it would be harmful. Such hypothesis can only be proved or disproved by someone with detailed knowledge, not by simple comparison with eating habit of our ancestors.
It may also be a matter of convenience for the parents—if you let the child stop eating when they feel like it, they might be hungry in a half an hour, when you were hoping to do something else.
I’d want to see some cross-cultural work on how much parents control the amount small children eat.