I’ve seen that way too often. In fact, it seems like standard practice in American government to cripple your opponent’s policies and oppose their every action, then point to the failure as if it were their fault and a result of their policy. In other words, why take the chance of there naturally being bad consequences, when you can make sure?
I’ve seen that way too often. In fact, it seems like standard practice in American government to cripple your opponent’s policies and oppose their every action, then point to the failure as if it were their fault and a result of their policy. In other words, why take the chance of there naturally being bad consequences, when you can make sure?