I don’t know what you’re talking about. I’d wager 10-1 odds that women the “unsophisticated” feminists who ascribe to the “men can’t be victims of sexism view” have more education than the general population. The historical dependency is taught in intro WS classes and feminism 101 blogs; they call it “power plus prejudice.” Not all feminists agree with the redefinition, but more than a “comparatively small” number do.
I was talking about the subject of the context. I would now expand and simplify my claim to an assertion that your second bullet point is simply false.
I’d wager 10-1 odds that women the “unsophisticated” feminists who ascribe to the “men can’t be victims of sexism view” have more education than the general population.
I doubt you would find anyone with whom to make up such a wager—certainly not me.
I don’t know what you’re talking about. I’d wager 10-1 odds that women the “unsophisticated” feminists who ascribe to the “men can’t be victims of sexism view” have more education than the general population. The historical dependency is taught in intro WS classes and feminism 101 blogs; they call it “power plus prejudice.” Not all feminists agree with the redefinition, but more than a “comparatively small” number do.
I was talking about the subject of the context. I would now expand and simplify my claim to an assertion that your second bullet point is simply false.
I doubt you would find anyone with whom to make up such a wager—certainly not me.