The last two quotes are indeed correct, and the reddit one is a mix of true and false statements.
To begin with, the conclusion subtly replaces the original premise of arbitrarily high velocity with arbitrarily high acceleration. (Confusing velocity and acceleration is a Grade 10 science error.) Given that one cannot accelerate to or past the speed of light, near-infinite acceleration engine is indeed of no use inside a black hole. However, arbitrarily high velocity is a different matter. It lets you escape from inside a black hole horizon. Of course, going faster than light brings a host of other problems (and no, time travel is not one of them).
As you continue to fall, the event horizon opens up beneath you, so you feel as if you’re descending into a featureless black bowl. Meanwhile, the stars become more and more crowded into a circular region of sky centered on the point immediately aft.
This is true if you hover above the horizon, but false if you fall freely. In the latter case you will see some distortion, but nothing as dramatic.
And then the point goes out. All at once, as if God turned off the switch.
This is false if you travel slower than light. You still see basically the same picture as outside, at least for a while longer.
If you have a magical FTL spaceship, what you see is not at all easy to describe. For example, in your own frame of reference, you don’t have mass or energy, only velocity/momentum, the exact opposite of what we describe as being stationary. Moreover, any photon that hits you is perceived as having negative energy. Yet it does not give or take any of your own energy (you don’t have any in your own frame), it “simply” changes your velocity.
I cannot comment on the Alice and Bob quote, as I did not find it in the link.
Actually, I can talk about black holes forever, feel free to ask.
The last two quotes are indeed correct, and the reddit one is a mix of true and false statements.
To begin with, the conclusion subtly replaces the original premise of arbitrarily high velocity with arbitrarily high acceleration. (Confusing velocity and acceleration is a Grade 10 science error.) Given that one cannot accelerate to or past the speed of light, near-infinite acceleration engine is indeed of no use inside a black hole. However, arbitrarily high velocity is a different matter. It lets you escape from inside a black hole horizon. Of course, going faster than light brings a host of other problems (and no, time travel is not one of them).
This is true if you hover above the horizon, but false if you fall freely. In the latter case you will see some distortion, but nothing as dramatic.
This is false if you travel slower than light. You still see basically the same picture as outside, at least for a while longer.
If you have a magical FTL spaceship, what you see is not at all easy to describe. For example, in your own frame of reference, you don’t have mass or energy, only velocity/momentum, the exact opposite of what we describe as being stationary. Moreover, any photon that hits you is perceived as having negative energy. Yet it does not give or take any of your own energy (you don’t have any in your own frame), it “simply” changes your velocity.
I cannot comment on the Alice and Bob quote, as I did not find it in the link.
Actually, I can talk about black holes forever, feel free to ask.
Awesome, thanks.
I swear it was there, but now I can’t find it either.
I’d be interested to hear your opinion of Gravity Probe B.