Personally, I advocate “no interpretation”, in a sense “no ontology should be assigned to a mere interpretation”.
Can you elaborate on this? (I’m not voting it down, yet anyway; but it has −3 right now)
I’m guessing that your point is that seeing and thinking about experimental results for Themselves is more important than telling stories about them, yes?
Can you elaborate on this? (I’m not voting it down, yet anyway; but it has −3 right now)
I’m guessing that your point is that seeing and thinking about experimental results for Themselves is more important than telling stories about them, yes?