I’ve seen a lot of complaints about Metz’s history, but they all seem backwards to me. They seem like a satire of virtue ethics.
Who do you think he’s “working for”? If he is working for outside forces (eg, keeping a source happy), then drawing attention to it is exactly the best way to take it out of his hands and force him to work for his editor; and force his editor to work for the paper.
Writing puff pieces sounds more lazy than malicious to me.
I’ve seen a lot of complaints about Metz’s history, but they all seem backwards to me. They seem like a satire of virtue ethics.
Who do you think he’s “working for”? If he is working for outside forces (eg, keeping a source happy), then drawing attention to it is exactly the best way to take it out of his hands and force him to work for his editor; and force his editor to work for the paper.
Writing puff pieces sounds more lazy than malicious to me.