APMason comments on SotW: Check Consequentialism

APMason 29 Mar 2012 23:44 UTC
6 points

You happen to have carved out a small portion of the Internet, a medium that aside from porn is primarily for pirates vs. ninjas debates, and declared it’s for some other purpose. That doesn’t mean you’re allowed to be surprised when pirates vs. ninjas debates happen.

Is he allowed to be surprised when lesswrong porn happens?
- thomblake 29 Mar 2012 23:48 UTC
  7 points
  Parent
  I think porn itself has somehow managed to stay off Less Wrong long enough to warrant surprise.
  
  But no, it’s not warranted to believe that porn about Less Wrong does not exist. Rule 34.
  - gwern 30 Mar 2012 1:32 UTC
    15 points
    Parent
    I’ve joked in the past about writing YudkowskyxBostrom slash fics; I swear to Bayes, if people keep annoyingly discussing LW porn, I will write it!
    - MixedNuts 30 Mar 2012 11:27 UTC
      9 points
      Parent
      Please include a threesome with Vassar.
      - Multiheaded 2 Apr 2012 10:10 UTC
        1 point
        Parent
        Pass the brain bleach.
    - thomblake 30 Mar 2012 2:13 UTC
      2 points
      Parent
      I’d write it, but I’m too busy working on that fic where Harry has to marry Draco to save someone from Azkaban.
    - thomblake 30 Mar 2012 1:56 UTC
      2 points
      Parent
      Corollary to Rule 35. You have to now.
  - Blueberry 30 Mar 2012 0:18 UTC
    3 points
    Parent
    It’s not porn, but did you see Yvain’s drawing?
    - thomblake 30 Mar 2012 0:23 UTC
      0 points
      Parent
      Thanks, I hadn’t seen that. Though for maximal thread derailment, the image really should’ve appeared right in your comment.