Thanks for your reply. Sorry about that second bullet point and I no longer endorse it—I think that after being annoyed by the first issue, I was in a looking-for-trouble frame of mind while interpreting the rest and read in something that really wasn’t there.
Thanks for your reply. Sorry about that second bullet point and I no longer endorse it—I think that after being annoyed by the first issue, I was in a looking-for-trouble frame of mind while interpreting the rest and read in something that really wasn’t there.