This is probably not a great forum to take nutritional advice from—LW many have human rationality down better than most but the domains of food and methods of thinking are far apart. For what to do, I would either do the research or trust nutritionists that aren’t selling anything. Alternatively, find healthy people or populations and ask them what they do.
This is probably not a great forum to take nutritional advice from—LW many have human rationality down better than most but the domains of food and methods of thinking are far apart.
Questions about what the most instrumentally rational practice is for a task shared by all humans are not not outside the domain of human rationality. If it happens that lesswrong is as bad at nutrition as you imply then that represents a failure according to the expressed and actual values of the site.
It seems to me inconsistent to suggest that a random LW user can usefully “do the research” but cannot usefully extract information from other random LW users, some of which probably believe that they have “done the research.”
There’s a selection bias problem, the people most likely to comment are those with strongly held outlier veiws rather than the majority who have considered the problem and come to some moderate solution.
This is probably not a great forum to take nutritional advice from—LW many have human rationality down better than most but the domains of food and methods of thinking are far apart. For what to do, I would either do the research or trust nutritionists that aren’t selling anything. Alternatively, find healthy people or populations and ask them what they do.
Questions about what the most instrumentally rational practice is for a task shared by all humans are not not outside the domain of human rationality. If it happens that lesswrong is as bad at nutrition as you imply then that represents a failure according to the expressed and actual values of the site.
It seems to me inconsistent to suggest that a random LW user can usefully “do the research” but cannot usefully extract information from other random LW users, some of which probably believe that they have “done the research.”
There’s a selection bias problem, the people most likely to comment are those with strongly held outlier veiws rather than the majority who have considered the problem and come to some moderate solution.
Nutritionists are a profession. Almost per definition they are selling something.