Exaggerating it only a little, out of exasperation at its inanity.
If God thinks as you described, then the best of humans are more ethical than God, because they wouldn’t set in motion thousands of years of wars and famine, and millions of years of ruthless natural selection, for the sake of—I don’t even know what. The eventual existence of “meaningfully moral agents”?
All these theodical problems arise for well-understood reasons—you insist on believing, despite appearances, that God is both all-powerful and good. Maybe you’d be better off with some process metaphysics in which good is scarcely present at the beginning, but can improve with time. I’m not particularly endorsing it, there are numerous metaphysical possibilities, but at least it would make more sense.
Exaggerating it only a little, out of exasperation at its inanity.
If God thinks as you described, then the best of humans are more ethical than God, because they wouldn’t set in motion thousands of years of wars and famine, and millions of years of ruthless natural selection, for the sake of—I don’t even know what. The eventual existence of “meaningfully moral agents”?
All these theodical problems arise for well-understood reasons—you insist on believing, despite appearances, that God is both all-powerful and good. Maybe you’d be better off with some process metaphysics in which good is scarcely present at the beginning, but can improve with time. I’m not particularly endorsing it, there are numerous metaphysical possibilities, but at least it would make more sense.