An uncharitable reading, notice the “consistent” and referring to an acceptable ratio of (implied) signal/noise in the very first sentence.
Also, this may be biased, but I value relevant comments on algorithmic information theory particularly highly, and they are a rare enough commodity. We probably agree on that at least.
An uncharitable reading, notice the “consistent” and referring to an acceptable ratio of (implied) signal/noise in the very first sentence.
Also, this may be biased, but I value relevant comments on algorithmic information theory particularly highly, and they are a rare enough commodity. We probably agree on that at least.