Eugine’s beliefs are “politically incorrect”, but that’s not completely unusual at LW. The main reason why we don’t see them here often is that we don’t debate politics often. And ironically, Eugine’s downvoting crusades have contributed significantly to reducing the political debates on LW. There were times when we used to have a political debate in a separate thread or in an Open Thread once in a while. And at some moment, such debates started predictably ending with someone saying “I have disagreed with Eugine yesterday, and today I see I have lost hundreds of karma points and most of my old comments are at −1; fuck this”. This makes the debate unpleasant even for the people who on object level happen to agree with Eugine on the specific topic. Most of us see the difference between “I won the debate by providing convincing arguments” and “I won the debate by strategically downvoting or otherwise harrassing my opponents” (or “I won the debate because my opponents were harrassed by a third party”).
Also, Eugine’s comments seem like optimized to offend. Such comments are “convincing for the already believing, and irritating for the unbelieving”. They don’t change anyone’s opinion, and are usually used by a majority, to silence a minority. Ironically, majority is exactly what Eugine doesn’t have here. So this leaves me with two models:
Eugine is too mindkilled to understand all this nuance, despite having spent years here. He still doesn’t get what LW is about. In such case, his mental abilities are insufficient for LessWrong.
Eugine may understand the nuance, he just doesn’t give a fuck about rationality or LW culture. For him, victory of his tribe is the ultimate goal. That also means he doesn’t belong here, just for different reasons.
Regardless of whether he understands or doesn’t understand what he is doing wrong, he has shown no capacity to learn or to improve his behavior. Like, come on, it’s not like moderators are paranoidly observing IP addresses of every user to make sure the lifelong bans stay enforced. All he would have to do is to create a new account and change his behavior so that no one would suspect it’s the same person. He is either incapable or unwilling to do that. Well, fuck him; we are not here to provide him group therapy.
I mean, feel free to speculate about his true reasons. I am just saying they don’t change anything about the ban.
… comments seem like optimized to offend. Such comments are “convincing for the already believing, and irritating for the unbelieving”. They don’t change anyone’s opinion.
This is a very beautiful and short summary of how a lot of political discussions actually look like. This concept is not new for me, but I’ve never seen it summarized this well before.
I feel the same way — I’ve seen that kind of comment all over the place on other sites and in real life, but somehow I’d never created a category for them in my mind. Now that Villiam_Bur has called them out specifically, I think I can think about them more deliberately. I might even give them a snappy name to make them even easier to think about.
Also, Eugine’s comments seem like optimized to offend. Such comments are “convincing for the already believing, and irritating for the unbelieving”.
Did he start out this way or did this develop over time as he got more frustrated? I thought his comments got particularly worse after he got banned.
I mean, feel free to speculate about his true reasons. I am just saying they don’t change anything about the ban.
Let me be clear, I’m just trying to understand why this happened. This behavior absolutely should be banned. Even if he had reasons for his actions, they were still wrong and he’s still an asshole.
Eugine’s beliefs are “politically incorrect”, but that’s not completely unusual at LW. The main reason why we don’t see them here often is that we don’t debate politics often. And ironically, Eugine’s downvoting crusades have contributed significantly to reducing the political debates on LW. There were times when we used to have a political debate in a separate thread or in an Open Thread once in a while. And at some moment, such debates started predictably ending with someone saying “I have disagreed with Eugine yesterday, and today I see I have lost hundreds of karma points and most of my old comments are at −1; fuck this”. This makes the debate unpleasant even for the people who on object level happen to agree with Eugine on the specific topic. Most of us see the difference between “I won the debate by providing convincing arguments” and “I won the debate by strategically downvoting or otherwise harrassing my opponents” (or “I won the debate because my opponents were harrassed by a third party”).
Also, Eugine’s comments seem like optimized to offend. Such comments are “convincing for the already believing, and irritating for the unbelieving”. They don’t change anyone’s opinion, and are usually used by a majority, to silence a minority. Ironically, majority is exactly what Eugine doesn’t have here. So this leaves me with two models:
Eugine is too mindkilled to understand all this nuance, despite having spent years here. He still doesn’t get what LW is about. In such case, his mental abilities are insufficient for LessWrong.
Eugine may understand the nuance, he just doesn’t give a fuck about rationality or LW culture. For him, victory of his tribe is the ultimate goal. That also means he doesn’t belong here, just for different reasons.
Regardless of whether he understands or doesn’t understand what he is doing wrong, he has shown no capacity to learn or to improve his behavior. Like, come on, it’s not like moderators are paranoidly observing IP addresses of every user to make sure the lifelong bans stay enforced. All he would have to do is to create a new account and change his behavior so that no one would suspect it’s the same person. He is either incapable or unwilling to do that. Well, fuck him; we are not here to provide him group therapy.
I mean, feel free to speculate about his true reasons. I am just saying they don’t change anything about the ban.
This is a very beautiful and short summary of how a lot of political discussions actually look like. This concept is not new for me, but I’ve never seen it summarized this well before.
I feel the same way — I’ve seen that kind of comment all over the place on other sites and in real life, but somehow I’d never created a category for them in my mind. Now that Villiam_Bur has called them out specifically, I think I can think about them more deliberately. I might even give them a snappy name to make them even easier to think about.
Did he start out this way or did this develop over time as he got more frustrated? I thought his comments got particularly worse after he got banned.
Let me be clear, I’m just trying to understand why this happened. This behavior absolutely should be banned. Even if he had reasons for his actions, they were still wrong and he’s still an asshole.
I think he got worse with time (though was never 100% unproblematic to begin with), but I’m fully not sure.
I don’t remember.
This comment is an excellent summary of Eugine_Nier’s history at LW and what’s wrong with his behavior.