I don’t think it was about randomness in general—I followed the links you posted and those show techniques that, while having some randomness, aren’t totally chance out puts (.5 yes .5 no, for example, instead 2⁄3 correct 1⁄3 incorrect). If you get a system that is wrong 80% of the time between two choices, it must have some way of differentiating the correct/incorrect answer, and choosing the incorrect one. If you can find why that is, you can invert it. Can you clarify more about what you felt was inaccurate? Given my software experience though, I will accept that the inferential distance is too large to be worth your time.
I don’t think it was about randomness in general—I followed the links you posted and those show techniques that, while having some randomness, aren’t totally chance out puts (.5 yes .5 no, for example, instead 2⁄3 correct 1⁄3 incorrect). If you get a system that is wrong 80% of the time between two choices, it must have some way of differentiating the correct/incorrect answer, and choosing the incorrect one. If you can find why that is, you can invert it. Can you clarify more about what you felt was inaccurate? Given my software experience though, I will accept that the inferential distance is too large to be worth your time.