The article in question interpreting the paper is written by someone who clearly did not accept global warming to begin with (adopting an astonishingly biased tone), and http://judicial-corruption.net/2011/07/climate-scientists-blow-gaping-hole-in-%E2%80%98nasa-data%E2%80%99-paper-by-ideologue-roy-spencer/ this for instance argues that the science in the paper is bad. I am not a climatologist, so have no means by which to assess this paper on my own, but when one paper is claimed to utterly destroy current models it might be best to be a little skeptical for a while.
EDIT: I don’t think its a NASA study, by the way, it just uses NASA data.
The article in question interpreting the paper is written by someone who clearly did not accept global warming to begin with (adopting an astonishingly biased tone), and http://judicial-corruption.net/2011/07/climate-scientists-blow-gaping-hole-in-%E2%80%98nasa-data%E2%80%99-paper-by-ideologue-roy-spencer/ this for instance argues that the science in the paper is bad. I am not a climatologist, so have no means by which to assess this paper on my own, but when one paper is claimed to utterly destroy current models it might be best to be a little skeptical for a while.
EDIT: I don’t think its a NASA study, by the way, it just uses NASA data.