At this point, I think we may be having problems with radically different priors, part of which is that I give Aaronson enough credit that I don’t think he’s going to go the most radical end of the women’s studies department and ask for their analysis to get some idea of what happened.
He can only get information from the people who handled the case, who are likely to be SJW-types.
He can only get information from the people who handled the case, who are likely to be SJW-types.
These issues are handled in general by university committees. Does your lack of knowledge on this fact cause you to update at all about how good your judgment is for such issues?
Also it is worth noting that “SJW-types” in most contexts is a group which is by and large restricted to certain parts of the internet or some parts of certaind departments on campuses.
He can only get information from the people who handled the case, who are likely to be SJW-types.
These issues are handled in general by university committees. Does your lack of knowledge on this fact cause you to update at all about how good your judgment is for such issues?
Also it is worth noting that “SJW-types” in most contexts is a group which is by and large restricted to certain parts of the internet or some parts of certaind departments on campuses.