I think you are confusing the word “color” that identifies a certain type of visual experience, with the word “color” that identifies a certain set of light-frequencies.
This is much like confusing the word “sound” which means “auditory experience”, with the word “sound” which means “acoustic vibrations”.
You see certain frequencies in a different way than people with red-green colour blindness; in short these frequencies lead to different qualia, different visual experiences. That’s rather obvious and rather useless in discussing the deeper philosophical point.
But to say that you experience certain visual experiences differently than others experience them, may even be a contradiction in terms—unless it’s meant that the atomic qualia trigger in turn different qualia (e.g. different memories or feelings) in each person. Which is probably also trivially true...
Your second paragraph encapsulates the point I intended to convey; that given frequencies of light create in my mind qualia that differ from the qualia created by the same frequency of light in the mind of a red-green colourblind person.
On the common sense view that qualia are the kolors generated by our minds, which do so based on sensory input about the colors in the world, it makes sense that color-to-kolor conversion (if you will) should be imperfect even among people with properly functioning sight.
Its possible my writing wasn’t clear enough to convey this point (or that you were objecting to CCC, not me), but I was getting at the idea that we probably do experience slightly different kolors. It was never my intention to be philosophically “rigorous” about that, just to raise the point.
I think you are confusing the word “color” that identifies a certain type of visual experience, with the word “color” that identifies a certain set of light-frequencies. This is much like confusing the word “sound” which means “auditory experience”, with the word “sound” which means “acoustic vibrations”.
You see certain frequencies in a different way than people with red-green colour blindness; in short these frequencies lead to different qualia, different visual experiences. That’s rather obvious and rather useless in discussing the deeper philosophical point.
But to say that you experience certain visual experiences differently than others experience them, may even be a contradiction in terms—unless it’s meant that the atomic qualia trigger in turn different qualia (e.g. different memories or feelings) in each person. Which is probably also trivially true...
Apologies for the confusion.
Your second paragraph encapsulates the point I intended to convey; that given frequencies of light create in my mind qualia that differ from the qualia created by the same frequency of light in the mind of a red-green colourblind person.
On the common sense view that qualia are the kolors generated by our minds, which do so based on sensory input about the colors in the world, it makes sense that color-to-kolor conversion (if you will) should be imperfect even among people with properly functioning sight.
Its possible my writing wasn’t clear enough to convey this point (or that you were objecting to CCC, not me), but I was getting at the idea that we probably do experience slightly different kolors. It was never my intention to be philosophically “rigorous” about that, just to raise the point.