If you rejected the first bet and accepted the second bet, just that[4] is enough to rule you out from having any[5] utility function consistent with your decisions.[6]
I argue that the claim is false. Even if there’s a claim in the link paper that’s more complex and that’s true, that doesn’t change that the claim you are making in the beginning still is false.
Your post makes the claim
If you rejected the first bet and accepted the second bet, just that[4] is enough to rule you out from having any[5] utility function consistent with your decisions.[6]
I argue that the claim is false. Even if there’s a claim in the link paper that’s more complex and that’s true, that doesn’t change that the claim you are making in the beginning still is false.