I guess the bottom line is that, when it comes to fields like philosophy and history, the literature will be heavily biased by the authors, and if one really wants to reduce this bias the one must consult multiple sources.
Yes. There’s another single-volume history of philosophy, by Anthony Kenny, that’s alleged to be good. I would expect Kenny to have a quite different set of biases from Russell’s (and for what it’s worth less like my own than Russell’s). I have it on my shelves but it’s one of the hundreds I haven’t read yet so I can’t endorse it (or the reverse) independently. I’ve no idea whether there’s an audiobook of it.
I guess the bottom line is that, when it comes to fields like philosophy and history, the literature will be heavily biased by the authors, and if one really wants to reduce this bias the one must consult multiple sources.
Yes. There’s another single-volume history of philosophy, by Anthony Kenny, that’s alleged to be good. I would expect Kenny to have a quite different set of biases from Russell’s (and for what it’s worth less like my own than Russell’s). I have it on my shelves but it’s one of the hundreds I haven’t read yet so I can’t endorse it (or the reverse) independently. I’ve no idea whether there’s an audiobook of it.