Which part? Is lack of interest in steel manning YEC just a sign of tribal affiliations?
Both points—the lack of consistency, and privileging the hypothesis.
(In fairness, it’s more than “tribal affliliations”. There are probably all sorts of biases creating this particular danger in being half a rationalist.)
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Which part? Is lack of interest in steel manning YEC just a sign of tribal affiliations?
Both points—the lack of consistency, and privileging the hypothesis.
(In fairness, it’s more than “tribal affliliations”. There are probably all sorts of biases creating this particular danger in being half a rationalist.)