I’m trying to parse this, and I think we’re saying the same thing and you’re just using the word Babble differently. I’ve roughly defined Babble as “pseudo-randomly generated proto-thoughts”, and good Babble as “insight-rich input from which Prune can find insight.” Help?
I’m saying that the Bible has content, and this content is understandable, but it takes some active work to understand because unlike most modern writing it is not spoon-feeding you everything.
I’m trying to parse this, and I think we’re saying the same thing and you’re just using the word Babble differently. I’ve roughly defined Babble as “pseudo-randomly generated proto-thoughts”, and good Babble as “insight-rich input from which Prune can find insight.” Help?
I’m saying that the Bible has content, and this content is understandable, but it takes some active work to understand because unlike most modern writing it is not spoon-feeding you everything.