Regardless of what I do, I expect the program to provide a response at the end.
I dont think that is literally true.
Like I said in response to another comment—if you want to “debug” my thinking process, absolutely fair enough; but provide the result. What you are doing, to carry on your analogy, is to say “hmm there may be a bug there. But I won’t tell you what the program will give as an output even if you fix it”.
What is that supposed to be analogous to? Which ethics is uniquely picked out by your criteria? I dont think any are. I think there are obviously a countable infinity of consistent ethical systems.
I dont think that is literally true.
What is that supposed to be analogous to? Which ethics is uniquely picked out by your criteria? I dont think any are. I think there are obviously a countable infinity of consistent ethical systems.