What experiment could you possibly perform to test moral-realist hypotheses, particularly when dealing with nonhumans?
You seem to be confusing atheism with positivism. In particular, the kind of positivism that’s self-refuting.
In what fashion is positivism self-refuting?
The proposition “only propositions that can be empirically tested are meaningful” cannot be empirically tested.
Its meaningless by its own epistemology.
Eppur si muove! It still works.
Works at what? Note that it,s not a synonym for science or empiricism , or the scientific method .
You seem to be confusing atheism with positivism. In particular, the kind of positivism that’s self-refuting.
In what fashion is positivism self-refuting?
The proposition “only propositions that can be empirically tested are meaningful” cannot be empirically tested.
Its meaningless by its own epistemology.
Eppur si muove! It still works.
Works at what? Note that it,s not a synonym for science or empiricism , or the scientific method .