Languages are implemented in individual brains and so private languages are perfectly conceptually possible, Wittgenstein notwithstanding.
That was meant humorously. Obviously such things exist. But one could argue that these do not match some strict definitions of what a language is.
Sorry about that, then. I’ve just heard too many philosophers say such things non-humorously.
Languages are implemented in individual brains and so private languages are perfectly conceptually possible, Wittgenstein notwithstanding.
That was meant humorously. Obviously such things exist. But one could argue that these do not match some strict definitions of what a language is.
Sorry about that, then. I’ve just heard too many philosophers say such things non-humorously.