The paper Are Disagreements Honest? by Tyler Cowen and Robin Hanson seems relevant. I strongly recommend reading the paper, but the abstract summarizes the main relevant point:
Typical disagreement seems explainable by a combination of random belief influences and by priors that tell each person that he reasons better than others.
The paper Are Disagreements Honest? by Tyler Cowen and Robin Hanson seems relevant. I strongly recommend reading the paper, but the abstract summarizes the main relevant point:
(Edited for clarity)