See note on ambiguity at the end of my second post.
Also, one ambiguity that may be creating misunderstanding on both our parts: Ideally, no one should be generally unhappy, no matter what state the world is in. What they should be is unhappy about things, so that they can work harder to solve them—and they should be unhappy about things in proportion to how bad they are.
Ideally, no one should be generally unhappy, no matter what state the world is in. What they should be is unhappy about things, so that they can work harder to solve them.
This is great—if you can, this insight should be turned into another top-level post.
See note on ambiguity at the end of my second post.
This is great—if you can, this insight should be turned into another top-level post.