+1, I endorse this summary. I also agree that GPT-3 was an update towards the environment not mattering as much as I thought.
Your summary might be clearer if you rephrase as:
It considers two possibilities: the “easy paths hypothesis” that which many environments would incentivize AGI, and the “hard paths hypothesis” that such environments are rare.
Since “easy paths” and “hard paths” by themselves are kinda ambiguous terms—are we talking about the paths, or the hypothesis? This is probably my fault for choosing bad terminology.
+1, I endorse this summary. I also agree that GPT-3 was an update towards the environment not mattering as much as I thought.
Your summary might be clearer if you rephrase as:
It considers two possibilities: the “easy paths hypothesis” that which many environments would incentivize AGI, and the “hard paths hypothesis” that such environments are rare.
Since “easy paths” and “hard paths” by themselves are kinda ambiguous terms—are we talking about the paths, or the hypothesis? This is probably my fault for choosing bad terminology.
Done :)