I think this way of organizing footnotes is better than most that I’ve seen on LW.
But footnote 3 refers to footnote 2 for the discussion of Maudlin’s book where it should refer to footnote 1.
Fixed!
Thanks! I assume you’re referring primarily to the way I made sure footnotes appear in the outline by using subheadings, and perhaps secondarily to aesthetics.
Just referring to the primary thing.
I think this way of organizing footnotes is better than most that I’ve seen on LW.
But footnote 3 refers to footnote 2 for the discussion of Maudlin’s book where it should refer to footnote 1.
Fixed!
Thanks! I assume you’re referring primarily to the way I made sure footnotes appear in the outline by using subheadings, and perhaps secondarily to aesthetics.
Just referring to the primary thing.