Structuring reality wil have effctson how you can understand and manipualte it. This post has a tone where we have this very sophisticated and cool understanding and everything that fails to be it must be dumb and ignorant. Sure it could be important for a life form to understand and manipulate realtedness based lines but does that lead that other proficiencies are forbidden?
Medical science uses the word âinfectionâ and doesnât make it go away as being ambigious. If distinguishing between baterial and viral infection is not overwhelming why not adopt a similar mode for âfishâ? Or why does not the fish argument apply for the abolishment of âinfectionâ?
Taking loan and coinage from toki pona call âgeneric land animalâ someli and âsea animalâ kala. If the foreing quest thinks âthats a weird someliâ and you insist âthats a cat not a someliâ its not clear to me why it would be okay to impose english standard over toki ona standards. Further more if some memer comes along and says âthats not a dog but a dogeâ shouldnât you accept their technoloogy of hidden additional knowledge and use the more sophisticated term? Why would detail level of dogs dominate over other detail levels?
For conspiracy and esoteric thinking one might be tempted to entertain the idea if Jona was captured into a unidentified submerging object. None of the biology âcluster hittingâ would apply particularly well then but âbig fishâ in the âaquatic animalâ sense would be much closer.
There are also a lot of idioms such as âthere are plenty of fish in the seaâ, âeasy like shooting fish in a barrelâ and âlike fish out of waterâ which make way more sense in the kala sense than as biological clusters and operate in the adaptational sense and limited sense as biological clusters. A movie like âfree willyâ makes sense because a water container is enough to work as a prison for a whale.
For treating a disease overdiagnosing can mean later than neccesary treament and access. For some differential diagnoses it is proper to stop asking questions, the differential doesnât need to be of infinite resolution. For a bacterial infection you donât neccearily need to know the bacteria strain and describing a generic antibacterial might be highly proper.
Also to a similar kind of mode that bats are flyers penguin are very lose to being kala. I would imagine that for the purposes of tracing poison accumulation and transfer that dolpins and penguins would be very similarly situated. A study on how radioactive materials impact fish would probably include those for the reality carving reasons. Such a delineations would survive âsailor of oldâ kind of antiquement critisms.
That the relatedness cravins are powerful doesnât mean one gets to be blind to the other connections or that one must always use relatedness compatible concepts. Thusd demanding overwheming reverence can get harmful.
Structuring reality wil have effctson how you can understand and manipualte it. This post has a tone where we have this very sophisticated and cool understanding and everything that fails to be it must be dumb and ignorant. Sure it could be important for a life form to understand and manipulate realtedness based lines but does that lead that other proficiencies are forbidden?
Medical science uses the word âinfectionâ and doesnât make it go away as being ambigious. If distinguishing between baterial and viral infection is not overwhelming why not adopt a similar mode for âfishâ? Or why does not the fish argument apply for the abolishment of âinfectionâ?
Taking loan and coinage from toki pona call âgeneric land animalâ someli and âsea animalâ kala. If the foreing quest thinks âthats a weird someliâ and you insist âthats a cat not a someliâ its not clear to me why it would be okay to impose english standard over toki ona standards. Further more if some memer comes along and says âthats not a dog but a dogeâ shouldnât you accept their technoloogy of hidden additional knowledge and use the more sophisticated term? Why would detail level of dogs dominate over other detail levels?
For conspiracy and esoteric thinking one might be tempted to entertain the idea if Jona was captured into a unidentified submerging object. None of the biology âcluster hittingâ would apply particularly well then but âbig fishâ in the âaquatic animalâ sense would be much closer.
There are also a lot of idioms such as âthere are plenty of fish in the seaâ, âeasy like shooting fish in a barrelâ and âlike fish out of waterâ which make way more sense in the kala sense than as biological clusters and operate in the adaptational sense and limited sense as biological clusters. A movie like âfree willyâ makes sense because a water container is enough to work as a prison for a whale.
For treating a disease overdiagnosing can mean later than neccesary treament and access. For some differential diagnoses it is proper to stop asking questions, the differential doesnât need to be of infinite resolution. For a bacterial infection you donât neccearily need to know the bacteria strain and describing a generic antibacterial might be highly proper.
Also to a similar kind of mode that bats are flyers penguin are very lose to being kala. I would imagine that for the purposes of tracing poison accumulation and transfer that dolpins and penguins would be very similarly situated. A study on how radioactive materials impact fish would probably include those for the reality carving reasons. Such a delineations would survive âsailor of oldâ kind of antiquement critisms.
That the relatedness cravins are powerful doesnât mean one gets to be blind to the other connections or that one must always use relatedness compatible concepts. Thusd demanding overwheming reverence can get harmful.