I would imagine “fairness” would also involve that I would be justified in believing in the exposure to the possibility (even if I would also be justified in disbelieving). So it can’t be perfectly faultless at the same time.
As posed it seems like “would you prefer a random existence to your current existence?” and my instinct is to try to remember the possibility and activate it if I ever start to feel ennui.
I would imagine “fairness” would also involve that I would be justified in believing in the exposure to the possibility (even if I would also be justified in disbelieving). So it can’t be perfectly faultless at the same time.
As posed it seems like “would you prefer a random existence to your current existence?” and my instinct is to try to remember the possibility and activate it if I ever start to feel ennui.