Typo in title: prioritize, not priorities.
Here’s Claude’s take on a diagram to make this less confusing.
The diagram did not make things less confusing, and in fact did the opposite. A table would be more practical imo.
10 chat sessions
As in, for each possible config, and each possible channel, run ten times from scratch? For a total of 360 actual sessions? This isn’t clear to me.
Regardless: a small useful falsifiable practical result, with no egregious errors in the parts of the methodology I understand. Upvoted.
Much appreciated!
I’ll:
Correct that typo
Add a section back in to hopefully make it less confusing
Typo in title: prioritize, not priorities.
The diagram did not make things less confusing, and in fact did the opposite. A table would be more practical imo.
As in, for each possible config, and each possible channel, run ten times from scratch? For a total of 360 actual sessions? This isn’t clear to me.
Regardless: a small useful falsifiable practical result, with no egregious errors in the parts of the methodology I understand. Upvoted.
Much appreciated!
I’ll:
Correct that typo
Add a section back in to hopefully make it less confusing