Presumably the solution is to ask the question, then if someone says yes to check if it’s chronic or otherwise explained before escorting them automatically out of the building, or at least to say ‘non-chronic’ or ‘new’ or something. I would actually want to avoid ‘explained’ here and at most let a follow-up determine what counts as explained.
Or you could not deny treatment to symptomatic people, whether they have COVID or not.
I continue to be rather baffled by the whole ‘wait and see’ attitude, unless it’s another case of avoiding blame and social pressure, in this case by avoiding taking a position, and doesn’t cash out to anything at all. What are we waiting to see, at this point? We’ve given about 100 million doses in the United States and everything’s going great so literally what do these people worry they are going to see? Is it basically this?
That seems like an intuitive version(“native implementation”?) of a safety trial.
We Have Established as Common Knowledge That Andrew Cuomo Is The Worst
Congratulations.
Fun Fact: Germany stopped AstraZeneca vaccinations as well.
Or you could not deny treatment to symptomatic people, whether they have COVID or not.
That seems like an intuitive version(“native implementation”?) of a safety trial.
Congratulations.
Fun Fact: Germany stopped AstraZeneca vaccinations as well.