Rather, I would say it’s been defined quite well in a way that makes sense to people in that scene, but not translated to a definition that makes sense for rationalists.
It’s a step from “having nothing on LW at all about this” and allows for further clarification. I commend Chris for creating something to build off of.
It hasn’t been defined at all, even vaguely.
I’ll write another post soon with links that will provide something of an extensive (in the philosophical sense) definition.
Rather, I would say it’s been defined quite well in a way that makes sense to people in that scene, but not translated to a definition that makes sense for rationalists.
What use is that?
It’s a step from “having nothing on LW at all about this” and allows for further clarification. I commend Chris for creating something to build off of.
I second this. I have no idea who this post is talking about, and find that I am very confused about this whole “Sensemaking scene” thing.