I’m also like this, somewhat. I only scored a 13, but I am in no way neuro typical. Although someone who worked closely with Asperger’s people said I had some of the properties of Asberger’s.
I do more closely relate to the schizoid personality disorder that Risto posted. Although that linked it to autistic thinking as well.
I suspect that it is a mix of the two options, some people/society in general are lumping every introverted neuro untypical into asperger’s/autism however there are two groups in that larger group.
some people/society in general are lumping every introverted neuro untypical into asperger’s/autism however there are two groups in that larger group
Yeah… I read Risto’s link (I think I’d read it before), and I do see some similarities there, but neither lines up with me 100%… the more I read about these things, the more it seems to me like the whole idea of classifying psychiatric ‘disorders’ is just bunk—a widely diverse range of personality characteristics are just being artificially crammed onto a one dimensional scale, and then clusters are labeled as ‘disorders’ despite not really having a common cause.
I’d agree. I suspect that there might be some real clusters with common causes, but then there are probably lots of other people that appear in or near that cluster that don’t have that cause.
Here is an interesting experiment that critiques the psychiatric profession I came across while trying to find about the scientific basis of the DSM classifications (little).
I’m also like this, somewhat. I only scored a 13, but I am in no way neuro typical. Although someone who worked closely with Asperger’s people said I had some of the properties of Asberger’s.
I do more closely relate to the schizoid personality disorder that Risto posted. Although that linked it to autistic thinking as well.
I suspect that it is a mix of the two options, some people/society in general are lumping every introverted neuro untypical into asperger’s/autism however there are two groups in that larger group.
Yeah… I read Risto’s link (I think I’d read it before), and I do see some similarities there, but neither lines up with me 100%… the more I read about these things, the more it seems to me like the whole idea of classifying psychiatric ‘disorders’ is just bunk—a widely diverse range of personality characteristics are just being artificially crammed onto a one dimensional scale, and then clusters are labeled as ‘disorders’ despite not really having a common cause.
I’d agree. I suspect that there might be some real clusters with common causes, but then there are probably lots of other people that appear in or near that cluster that don’t have that cause.
Here is an interesting experiment that critiques the psychiatric profession I came across while trying to find about the scientific basis of the DSM classifications (little).