Whether or not they are explained, the import thing I’m pointing at is that they are of the same type, hence whether or not you find an explanation satisfying, it is aiming to explain the same kind of thing.
I can categorsise stones , and I can categorise flowers, but that doesn’t mean stones are flowers. In general, the ability to categorise things of type X doesn’t exhaustively describe them because they also have intrinsic properties. There is a theory of qualia according to which they don’t have any interesting properties other than bring different from each other, the GENSYM, theory, but I don’t know whether you’re be endorsing it.
Whether or not they are explained, the import thing I’m pointing at is that they are of the same type, hence whether or not you find an explanation satisfying, it is aiming to explain the same kind of thing.
I can categorsise stones , and I can categorise flowers, but that doesn’t mean stones are flowers. In general, the ability to categorise things of type X doesn’t exhaustively describe them because they also have intrinsic properties. There is a theory of qualia according to which they don’t have any interesting properties other than bring different from each other, the GENSYM, theory, but I don’t know whether you’re be endorsing it.