It’s not a primer on how to influence people, it’s a discussion of the philosophy behind influencing people. It’s also something that a Slytherin would read for entertainment, in much the same way that a Gryfindor would read The Chronicles of Narnia.
The Screwtape Letters as their intended to be read strike me as more Hufflepuff, and the portrayal of hell is sufficiently negative that I don’t see a Slytherin enjoying it by sympathizing with the demons.
I wonder where The Adventures of Tom Sawyer should be?
I say Gryffindor. Tom is obviously a Gryffindor, and though the tone of the book is somewhat mocking, he is nevertheless clearly the hero and triumphs in the end. (As far as I remember at least; I haven’t read it since I was a child).
Yet Twain’s ouvre spans all Houses: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is Hufflepuff, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court is Ravenclaw, and The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg is Slytherin.
It’s not a primer on how to influence people, it’s a discussion of the philosophy behind influencing people. It’s also something that a Slytherin would read for entertainment, in much the same way that a Gryfindor would read The Chronicles of Narnia.
The Screwtape Letters as their intended to be read strike me as more Hufflepuff, and the portrayal of hell is sufficiently negative that I don’t see a Slytherin enjoying it by sympathizing with the demons.
If you only read things as the author intended that they be read, you’re missing a large fraction of the entertainment value.
I wonder where The Adventures of Tom Sawyer should be?
I say Gryffindor. Tom is obviously a Gryffindor, and though the tone of the book is somewhat mocking, he is nevertheless clearly the hero and triumphs in the end. (As far as I remember at least; I haven’t read it since I was a child).
Yet Twain’s ouvre spans all Houses: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is Hufflepuff, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court is Ravenclaw, and The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg is Slytherin.