Why do you consider the possibility of smarter than Human AI at all? The difference between the AI we have now and that is bigger than the difference between those 2 technologies you are comparing.
I don’t understand why you are bothering asking your question—but to give a literal answer, my interest in synthesising intelligent agents is an offshoot of my interest in creating living things—which is an interest I have had for a long time and share with many others. Machine intelligence is obviously possible—assuming you have a materialist and naturalist world-view like mine.
I think someone needs to put forward the best case they can find that human brain emulations have much of a chance of coming before engineered machine intelligence.
I misunderstood. I thought you were saying it was your goal to prove that instead of you thought it would not be proven. My question does not make sense.
Why do you consider the possibility of smarter than Human AI at all? The difference between the AI we have now and that is bigger than the difference between those 2 technologies you are comparing.
I don’t understand why you are bothering asking your question—but to give a literal answer, my interest in synthesising intelligent agents is an offshoot of my interest in creating living things—which is an interest I have had for a long time and share with many others. Machine intelligence is obviously possible—assuming you have a materialist and naturalist world-view like mine.
I misunderstood. I thought you were saying it was your goal to prove that instead of you thought it would not be proven. My question does not make sense.
Thanks for clarifying!