Thanks for this. This is a much larger project than I expected. So I’m changing the schedule. I have no idea when I’ll finish, buy I want to finish.
I have a preliminary first draft of the paper available.
The first draft is very incomplete, so I’m not posting it here as its own post yet. If you want to get the sense of what I’m doing though, you should read it: current version of paper.
I already said that I don’t believe in the core assumptions you are making that it’s a good idea to try to go for an optimal research strategy.
As far as being serious about this, what’s with prior art? It’s likely that some economist has asked himself already the question of how to model scientific research. You could search for the prior art and argue why you deviate at certain points and what your motivation for the deviation is.
Thanks for this. This is a much larger project than I expected. So I’m changing the schedule. I have no idea when I’ll finish, buy I want to finish.
I have a preliminary first draft of the paper available.
The first draft is very incomplete, so I’m not posting it here as its own post yet. If you want to get the sense of what I’m doing though, you should read it: current version of paper.
Please review, criticise and make suggestions.
I already said that I don’t believe in the core assumptions you are making that it’s a good idea to try to go for an optimal research strategy.
As far as being serious about this, what’s with prior art? It’s likely that some economist has asked himself already the question of how to model scientific research. You could search for the prior art and argue why you deviate at certain points and what your motivation for the deviation is.
Do you mean “deviate” (as opposed to to “derivate”)?
Yes, I corrected the typo.