More relevantly, P(both have a goldfish named George) << P(they don’t, and there’s some trickery going on)
It’s actually quite a useful clue—obviously no psychological “mind-reading” technique could force it, so it must be some other trick, most likely the one garethrees suggests.
More relevantly, P(both have a goldfish named George) << P(they don’t, and there’s some trickery going on)
It’s actually quite a useful clue—obviously no psychological “mind-reading” technique could force it, so it must be some other trick, most likely the one garethrees suggests.