I’ve seen the claim that EA is about how you spend at least some of the money you put into charity, not a claim that improving the world should be your primary goal.
RichardKennaway:
Once you’ve decided to compare charities with each other to see which would make the most effective use of your money, can you avoid comparing charitable donation with all the non-charitable uses you might make of your money?
Richard’s question is a good one, but even if there’s no good answer it’s a psychological fact that people can get convinced that they should redirect their existing donations to cost-effective charities but not that charity should crowd out other spending—and that this is an easier sell. So the framing of EA that Nancy describes has practical value.
NancyLebovitz:
RichardKennaway:
Richard’s question is a good one, but even if there’s no good answer it’s a psychological fact that people can get convinced that they should redirect their existing donations to cost-effective charities but not that charity should crowd out other spending—and that this is an easier sell. So the framing of EA that Nancy describes has practical value.