What exactly do you mean with the word “consider” in that sentence? I think your trivial idea of what it might mean isn’t accurate enough to be useful in a case like this.
Well, I didn’t personally interview Kasparov so I don’t know any more than you do about what the article I read meant by ‘consider’ although it seems like a fairly unambiguous word to me. Simply tabooing every word in a discussion isn’t necessary helpful, it can simply slow the conversion down.
The idea that reading something from the brain takes no time or effect from the brain to parse the thought in a readable way is inaccurate.
Why should this require any extra effort on the part of the brain? Surely if you can read the relevant area of the brain, and have the computing power and understanding of neuroscience required, then any thought is readable. Are you a neuroscientist?
Surely if you can read the relevant area of the brain, and have the computing power and understanding of neuroscience required, then any thought is readable.
There no way you read billions of neurons accurately at the same time. That just not feasible.
The thing you can do is reading a bunch of neurons or reading a signal that aggregates the activity of a bunch of neurons.
Why should this require any extra effort on the part of the brain?
Nearly all BCI designs that are used in the real world take effort. A bunch of them even have a learning curve.
Are you a neuroscientist?
Depending how on wide you define the term. I have set in university course on neuroscience that discussed BCI’s.
Well, I didn’t personally interview Kasparov so I don’t know any more than you do about what the article I read meant by ‘consider’ although it seems like a fairly unambiguous word to me. Simply tabooing every word in a discussion isn’t necessary helpful, it can simply slow the conversion down.
Why should this require any extra effort on the part of the brain? Surely if you can read the relevant area of the brain, and have the computing power and understanding of neuroscience required, then any thought is readable. Are you a neuroscientist?
There no way you read billions of neurons accurately at the same time. That just not feasible. The thing you can do is reading a bunch of neurons or reading a signal that aggregates the activity of a bunch of neurons.
Nearly all BCI designs that are used in the real world take effort. A bunch of them even have a learning curve.
Depending how on wide you define the term. I have set in university course on neuroscience that discussed BCI’s.