Which ones are not actual properties of the collapse interpretation?
I don’t think Eliezer has suggested they were properties of all possible non-Everett interpretations.
Did you read the post I linked?
He certainly doesn’t seem to address anything but Everett and objective collapse (which he also appear to conflate with Copenhagen).
That later edit wasn’t in the comment when I read it. Thanks for adding.
Which ones are not actual properties of the collapse interpretation?
I don’t think Eliezer has suggested they were properties of all possible non-Everett interpretations.
Did you read the post I linked?
He certainly doesn’t seem to address anything but Everett and objective collapse (which he also appear to conflate with Copenhagen).
That later edit wasn’t in the comment when I read it. Thanks for adding.