I’d guess 10% is not an arbitrary number, but rather is a sort of market equilibrium that happens to be supportable by a certain interpretation of OT scripture. It might have just as well been 3% or 7% or 12% as these numbers are all pretty significant in the OT, and could have been used by leadership to impose that % on laypeople.
In any case, in my experience within the church, there are tithes… AND then there are offerings which include numerous different cause to give to on any given Sunday. It was often stated these causes (building projects, missions outreaches, etc.) were in addition to your tithe.
It is funny to me… it is almost like the reverse of a compensation plan you’d build for a team of commissioned sales people. Instead of trying to optimize the plan to best incentivize for sales performance by motivating your sales people to sell, the church may have evolved their doctrines and practices on giving to optimize for collecting revenue by motivating your members to give. Ha.
It might have just as well been 3% or 7% or 12% as these numbers are all pretty significant in the OT
This is of course no argument against anything substantive you’re saying, but while the numbers 3,7,12 are certainly all significant in the OT the idea of percentage surely wasn’t. I can see 1⁄3, or 1⁄7, or 1⁄12, though.
Good point. Though, from my recall, there isn’t much basis in the OT for the modern day concept of tithing at all, percentage or otherwise. Christianity points to verses about giving 1/10th of your crops to the priest as the basis.
If they really wanted to change the rules and up it to 1/7th, or 12% or anything they want, they could come up with some new basis for that match using fancy hermeneutics.
This is sort of what is happening right now with homosexuality. Many churches are changing their views. They are justifying that by reinterpreting the verses they’ve used to condemn it in the past.
In fact, you can pretty much get the Bible to support any position or far-fetched belief you’d like. You only need a few verses… and it’s a big book.
Right.
I’d guess 10% is not an arbitrary number, but rather is a sort of market equilibrium that happens to be supportable by a certain interpretation of OT scripture. It might have just as well been 3% or 7% or 12% as these numbers are all pretty significant in the OT, and could have been used by leadership to impose that % on laypeople.
In any case, in my experience within the church, there are tithes… AND then there are offerings which include numerous different cause to give to on any given Sunday. It was often stated these causes (building projects, missions outreaches, etc.) were in addition to your tithe.
It is funny to me… it is almost like the reverse of a compensation plan you’d build for a team of commissioned sales people. Instead of trying to optimize the plan to best incentivize for sales performance by motivating your sales people to sell, the church may have evolved their doctrines and practices on giving to optimize for collecting revenue by motivating your members to give. Ha.
This is of course no argument against anything substantive you’re saying, but while the numbers 3,7,12 are certainly all significant in the OT the idea of percentage surely wasn’t. I can see 1⁄3, or 1⁄7, or 1⁄12, though.
Good point. Though, from my recall, there isn’t much basis in the OT for the modern day concept of tithing at all, percentage or otherwise. Christianity points to verses about giving 1/10th of your crops to the priest as the basis.
If they really wanted to change the rules and up it to 1/7th, or 12% or anything they want, they could come up with some new basis for that match using fancy hermeneutics.
This is sort of what is happening right now with homosexuality. Many churches are changing their views. They are justifying that by reinterpreting the verses they’ve used to condemn it in the past.
In fact, you can pretty much get the Bible to support any position or far-fetched belief you’d like. You only need a few verses… and it’s a big book.
This is one of my favorites.