The OP is arguing that X is literally true. Framing it as a ‘steel-man’ of X is misleading; you may disagree with the claim, but engage with it as an actual attempt to describe reality, not as an attempt to steel-man or do the ‘well, maybe this thing will go wrong, we can’t be sure...’ thing.
There has never been a guarantee of safety of our or any other lifeform’s path through the evolutionary mysts.
EY isn’t asking for a guarantee; see −2 in the preamble.
The OP is arguing that X is literally true. Framing it as a ‘steel-man’ of X is misleading; you may disagree with the claim, but engage with it as an actual attempt to describe reality, not as an attempt to steel-man or do the ‘well, maybe this thing will go wrong, we can’t be sure...’ thing.
EY isn’t asking for a guarantee; see −2 in the preamble.